1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

noise

All Shovelhead topics
Post Reply
1957flhchop
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:12 am
Bikes: 1957 FLH(sold - dumb decision. I know)
1973 FLH chopped
2002 FXST
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 1 time

1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#1

Post by 1957flhchop »

I have adjusted the valves and the timing on my Shovel and ridden it a little. But, there are a couple things that have prevented me from riding it very far. I have been using 20w50 oil and the oil pressure appears to be good(35ish lbs on startup, 5-8 lbs when HOT).

1) When the engine is cold or even when it is somewhat warm(ridden a few miles, air temps in the 80s), the valvetrain doesn't make much noise(my opinion based on the Pan I used to ride). But, when the engine gets to full operating temp the valvetrain is noisier than I would have expected. Everything still seems to function OK, but noisy.

2) Once again, the only thing I have to base my comparison/assessment on is the '57 FLH I used to ride. But, it seems to me like it doesn't sound quite right in the mid range of rpms. That is, at idle it sounds good and when I already have the rpms up and then give it more throttle it also sounds pretty good. But, when I am initially accelerating it sounds off. Kind of like the jap v twins with open exhaust. The bike has the shorter drag pipes on it(almost identical to the ones that were on my Pan). Any ideas? This is the first Shovel I have ever had, so I'm not sure what to expect.

Thanks in advance. I appreciate your patience dealing with someone who is just kind of winging it since all the people in my personal life who would normally have helped me with this are either now deceased or in a state of failing mental health(Alzheimers/Dementia).
RooDog
Senior Member
Posts: 5327
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:00 pm
Bikes: 1950 Panhead, Resto-Mod
1968 90", 5 Speed Shovelhead,
1984 Home Built Custom Evo 100" Bagger
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Has thanked: 2801 times
Been thanked: 2159 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#2

Post by RooDog »

Lose the drag pipes. Get some decent mufflers that sound good, and then you can start tuning that bike. Unless you are fond of a shitty running loud & noisy motorcycle....
....RooDog....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjKUKhHQLHg
1957flhchop
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:12 am
Bikes: 1957 FLH(sold - dumb decision. I know)
1973 FLH chopped
2002 FXST
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#3

Post by 1957flhchop »

RooDog wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:31 am Lose the drag pipes. Get some decent mufflers that sound good, and then you can start tuning that bike. Unless you are fond of a shitty running loud & noisy motorcycle....
....RooDog....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjKUKhHQLHg
To each their own I suppose. The Pan I used to own had basically identical pipes and it ran quite well and sounded fantastic in my opinion. My twin cam also has drag pipes(although longer than my old Pan and my current Shovel) and they also sound great and(with some minor carb mods) that bike runs REALLY well.
RUBONE
Moderator
Senior Member
Posts: 8407
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:09 am
Bikes: Multiple H-D, Ducati, BMW, Triumph, BSA,...
Has thanked: 482 times
Been thanked: 2957 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#4

Post by RUBONE »

I personally hate drag pipes on a street bike. Noisy (you may like it, everyone else doesn't, and that actually matters), difficult to tune (no back pressure sucks with most cams), and incredibly inefficient power wise unless you are running a turbo or nitro...
If the top end is noisy it is likely tappet noise, very common on mid '70s Shovels.
Mid '70s shovels suck at producing power. The combination of carbs, timing, sketchy oil delivery, etc, all work against you. They can be beasts, don't expect that up front!
Early shovels ('66-'69), were like Panhead on steroids, '72-79 were factory choked...
And none come close tom a Knuckle!! :P
panhead_kicker
Senior Member
Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:57 am
Bikes: Pan
FLHP Evo
E-H Super X
Chubble head hack
Servi-car
Topper(s)
Model 64D (Hey its got 3 wheels!)
Location: Indianapolis
Has thanked: 405 times
Been thanked: 367 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#5

Post by panhead_kicker »

Have you checked your rocker arm end play? Source of a lot of topend tikity for a shovel.
Andygears
Senior Member
Posts: 1408
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:25 am
Bikes: 1950 panhead, 1999 FLHTCI, 1987 FLHTC custom
Location: Daytona Beach
Has thanked: 447 times
Been thanked: 651 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#6

Post by Andygears »

panhead_kicker wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 4:53 am Have you checked your rocker arm end play? Source of a lot of topend tikity for a shovel.
Agreed, even tightening the rocker shaft nuts can quiet things sometimes. And loosen the oil line to the front head to see oil delivery. And check your lifters, maybe somebody put solids in there, or worse, those solid lift adapters.

Andygears
panheadrider1961
Senior Member
Posts: 614
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:32 am
Bikes: 1961 fl 1976 fxe
Location: macon georgia
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 196 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#7

Post by panheadrider1961 »

Relation to sound a loud ticking or 2 hammers tapping? Once a shovelhead comes to temperature it grows and and is a little nosier than a pan ride evo that is in good shape and you will tell difference in all 3 then make your conclusio on noise factor
1957flhchop
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:12 am
Bikes: 1957 FLH(sold - dumb decision. I know)
1973 FLH chopped
2002 FXST
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#8

Post by 1957flhchop »

RUBONE wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:34 am I personally hate drag pipes on a street bike. Noisy (you may like it, everyone else doesn't, and that actually matters), difficult to tune (no back pressure sucks with most cams), and incredibly inefficient power wise unless you are running a turbo or nitro...
If the top end is noisy it is likely tappet noise, very common on mid '70s Shovels.
Mid '70s shovels suck at producing power. The combination of carbs, timing, sketchy oil delivery, etc, all work against you. They can be beasts, don't expect that up front!
Early shovels ('66-'69), were like Panhead on steroids, '72-79 were factory choked...
And none come close tom a Knuckle!! :P
Probably should have mentioned initially, the carb is an old S&S Super E.
Can a person put more advance in the timing than the Harley adjustment spec? Or is that just asking for trouble?

Also, I'm curious what made the early Shovels better than the Pan?
1957flhchop
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:12 am
Bikes: 1957 FLH(sold - dumb decision. I know)
1973 FLH chopped
2002 FXST
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#9

Post by 1957flhchop »

Andygears wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:11 pm
panhead_kicker wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 4:53 am Have you checked your rocker arm end play? Source of a lot of topend tikity for a shovel.
Agreed, even tightening the rocker shaft nuts can quiet things sometimes. And loosen the oil line to the front head to see oil delivery. And check your lifters, maybe somebody put solids in there, or worse, those solid lift adapters.

Andygears
How much delivery should I expect to see when it's hot? Also, would it make a measurable difference if I were to install one of those oil line setups where it Y's at the bottom and has a similar line going up to each cylinder?

Here's a pic of my lifters that I posted on another thread.
lifters 1.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
RooDog
Senior Member
Posts: 5327
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:00 pm
Bikes: 1950 Panhead, Resto-Mod
1968 90", 5 Speed Shovelhead,
1984 Home Built Custom Evo 100" Bagger
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Has thanked: 2801 times
Been thanked: 2159 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#10

Post by RooDog »

That motor has newer parts that 1973.
AM lifter blocks and lifters.
"80" jugs,
O-ring push rod tubes began in 1979/80.
1957flhchop
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:12 am
Bikes: 1957 FLH(sold - dumb decision. I know)
1973 FLH chopped
2002 FXST
Location: Iowa
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#11

Post by 1957flhchop »

RooDog wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 4:51 pm That motor has newer parts that 1973.
AM lifter blocks and lifters.
"80" jugs,
O-ring push rod tubes began in 1979/80.
Thanks for the heads up.

Curious, what indicates different jugs with a picture that I'll admit is certainly not great?
RooDog
Senior Member
Posts: 5327
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:00 pm
Bikes: 1950 Panhead, Resto-Mod
1968 90", 5 Speed Shovelhead,
1984 Home Built Custom Evo 100" Bagger
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Has thanked: 2801 times
Been thanked: 2159 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#12

Post by RooDog »

The square lug on the front of the jug at the base....
Also, the Allen screws in the lifter blocks are most likely 1/4-20 used from 1976 and up....
nifty
Senior Member
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2020 8:24 am
Bikes: 68 FL
Location: Nambour Qld Australia
Has thanked: 256 times
Been thanked: 477 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#13

Post by nifty »

1957flhchop wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 4:13 pm
RUBONE wrote: Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:34 am I personally hate drag pipes on a street bike. Noisy (you may like it, everyone else doesn't, and that actually matters), difficult to tune (no back pressure sucks with most cams), and incredibly inefficient power wise unless you are running a turbo or nitro...
If the top end is noisy it is likely tappet noise, very common on mid '70s Shovels.
Mid '70s shovels suck at producing power. The combination of carbs, timing, sketchy oil delivery, etc, all work against you. They can be beasts, don't expect that up front!
Early shovels ('66-'69), were like Panhead on steroids, '72-79 were factory choked...
And none come close tom a Knuckle!! :P
Probably should have mentioned initially, the carb is an old S&S Super E.
Can a person put more advance in the timing than the Harley adjustment spec? Or is that just asking for trouble?

Also, I'm curious what made the early Shovels better than the Pan?
re ignition advance: yes, and yes.

re Pan & Shovel performance: biggest gain; the Pan T intake manifold & ports were ditched for Shovel Y manifold & ports, straighter, better flowing shot at intake valve. higher performance, even with reduced valve lift due to early shovel rocker ratio (fixed later).

BTW your followers look like early Pan style solids and alum pushrod also not stock Shovel.

IMO Shovel rocker shafts should be a slight interference fit in rocker box, particularly at oil end, loose to start with, will be looser when hot and oil will be dumped into spring chamber, instead of going to all rockers. Shafts loose in rockerbox also another source of noise. Split or Y rocker oil feed pipe is a band-aid.

Nifty
RooDog
Senior Member
Posts: 5327
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:00 pm
Bikes: 1950 Panhead, Resto-Mod
1968 90", 5 Speed Shovelhead,
1984 Home Built Custom Evo 100" Bagger
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Has thanked: 2801 times
Been thanked: 2159 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#14

Post by RooDog »

re Pan & Shovel performance: biggest gain; the Pan T intake manifold & ports were ditched for Shovel Y manifold & ports, straighter, better flowing shot at intake valve. higher performance, even with reduced valve lift due to early shovel rocker ratio (fixed later).

Nifty
[/quote]

What's this about?
nifty
Senior Member
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2020 8:24 am
Bikes: 68 FL
Location: Nambour Qld Australia
Has thanked: 256 times
Been thanked: 477 times

Re: 1973 FLH top end and possible other issue?

#15

Post by nifty »

To answer I will start a new post
Nifty
Post Reply

Return to “Shovelhead”