Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:00 am
- Bikes: WLA Mk lll, civilianised
- Location: Gilgandra, New South Wales, Australia
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 117 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
It would be interesting to see a list of engine numbers and the date code associated with that engine number to see if there was indeed any sort of sequence in the assembly of engines.
I suppose one would have to study how the production of bikes was ramped up from the numbers made in 1941 (both WL and WLA) and the numbers produced in subsequent years. I imaging that a lot of effort in 1942 went into producing all the various components to assemble a bike, then in 1943 production rates rapidly increased to a plateau level where they remained until late 1944, early 1945 when demand started to fall due to the end of the war being in sight.
OME
I suppose one would have to study how the production of bikes was ramped up from the numbers made in 1941 (both WL and WLA) and the numbers produced in subsequent years. I imaging that a lot of effort in 1942 went into producing all the various components to assemble a bike, then in 1943 production rates rapidly increased to a plateau level where they remained until late 1944, early 1945 when demand started to fall due to the end of the war being in sight.
OME
-
- Moderator
- Senior Member
- Posts: 8406
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:09 am
- Bikes: Multiple H-D, Ducati, BMW, Triumph, BSA,...
- Has thanked: 481 times
- Been thanked: 2956 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
By 1941 full military production was underway and 45 production was virtually all going to the Army, along with BT SV models. Note this is dated 6 months before the attack at Pearl Harbor, and 8 months before civilian production is ceased.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 8:27 pm
- Bikes: WLA
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
For the WLA models only, there's a list on the Yahoo sites.old man emu wrote:It would be interesting to see a list of engine numbers and the date code associated with that engine number to see if there was indeed any sort of sequence in the assembly of engines.
I suppose one would have to study how the production of bikes was ramped up from the numbers made in 1941 (both WL and WLA) and the numbers produced in subsequent years. I imaging that a lot of effort in 1942 went into producing all the various components to assemble a bike, then in 1943 production rates rapidly increased to a plateau level where they remained until late 1944, early 1945 when demand started to fall due to the end of the war being in sight.
OME
You have to log in to be able to see the list though..
Some do and some don't have the castingcode listed, but it will give an overall look into things.
@Robbie: what a nice piece of history that letter is.
It gives a grand look in how hectic things became as war-production went booming..
Thanks!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1407
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:25 am
- Bikes: 1950 panhead, 1999 FLHTCI, 1987 FLHTC custom
- Location: Daytona Beach
- Has thanked: 447 times
- Been thanked: 651 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
Yep, Robbie that hails to a different age... When each and every customer was important. Sadly I'm afraid those days have become history, to read about but not experience.
Thanks
Andygears
Thanks
Andygears
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:29 am
- Bikes: H-D
- Location: Western Australia
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
I made a list of some DCs, BNs and SNs for Flathead 45 left cases cast in May 39 thru October 45. It looked fine when I typed it but it doesn't come out that way in the preview so I'll try another approach tomorrow.
Eric
Eric
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:29 am
- Bikes: H-D
- Location: Western Australia
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
In this post and the next is the list I made. Some BNs and SNs are unknown however and several SNs are non-factory (N-F) but maybe this will help give some idea how things went. As we'd expect, not every case was used in the order it was produced.
Eric
Eric
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:29 am
- Bikes: H-D
- Location: Western Australia
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
-
- Former member
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2789
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 2:10 pm
- Bikes: 1941/59 EL
1952 FL
1977 FLH
1994 Fatboy - Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 110 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
That's quite an impressive accumulation of numbers, Eric. As I was looking through them, I became curious- What started you down this particular path of research in the first place, if I may ask? I know it's more than VINs and B/Ns you study, it's pretty much all markings on Harleys over a wide range of years.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:29 am
- Bikes: H-D
- Location: Western Australia
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
Thanks Tom. I have photos of several others too for 39–45 but they didn’t show some details clearly enough to use in a list. Originally for this study I was working on 38–52 but then decided to start with May 39 because that is the earliest I have with 1940 BNs. And I ended with 1945 because there was no need at this stage to go beyond that.
I began DC research in earnest after a photo of L 6 on a BT trans case appeared on the old HTT. The owner, who is also a member here, said it meant Dec 46 and he was right. But a certain person disagreed and said it was Nov 46 because the letter I was skipped. Palmer’s 37–64 FE had nothing about the omission and I had not heard of it before so I asked questions. That certain person replied with an alleged update on DCs but he only confused things further. Anyway, I couldn’t believe the book and I didn’t get anywhere on the forum so I began researching DCs, casting numbers and other forms of ID for transmissions, crankcases, cylinders, heads etc.
Research into VINs really began after a Knuckle was discussed on the old HTT. It was alleged to be 36 but had a 40s long-rib case and an altered number boss. I didn’t know much about H-D stamps going back that far so I began studying the different types and what years/models they applied to. Later on I began researching BNs and other crankcase markings. And frames, BT round swingarms etc.
Eric
I began DC research in earnest after a photo of L 6 on a BT trans case appeared on the old HTT. The owner, who is also a member here, said it meant Dec 46 and he was right. But a certain person disagreed and said it was Nov 46 because the letter I was skipped. Palmer’s 37–64 FE had nothing about the omission and I had not heard of it before so I asked questions. That certain person replied with an alleged update on DCs but he only confused things further. Anyway, I couldn’t believe the book and I didn’t get anywhere on the forum so I began researching DCs, casting numbers and other forms of ID for transmissions, crankcases, cylinders, heads etc.
Research into VINs really began after a Knuckle was discussed on the old HTT. It was alleged to be 36 but had a 40s long-rib case and an altered number boss. I didn’t know much about H-D stamps going back that far so I began studying the different types and what years/models they applied to. Later on I began researching BNs and other crankcase markings. And frames, BT round swingarms etc.
Eric
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 8:27 pm
- Bikes: WLA
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
Nice list Eric...impressive.
I don't know who that person was stating that dropped 'I' from Date Codes, but that was not done before 1948...
It's a shame much of old information is lost in time due to fires, negligence or simply throwing papers away without giving it much thought..
Although much is made digital over the last years, not all is (or ever will)...so we're flying blind sometimes...no paper-trail to follow.
I don't know who that person was stating that dropped 'I' from Date Codes, but that was not done before 1948...
It's a shame much of old information is lost in time due to fires, negligence or simply throwing papers away without giving it much thought..
Although much is made digital over the last years, not all is (or ever will)...so we're flying blind sometimes...no paper-trail to follow.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:29 am
- Bikes: H-D
- Location: Western Australia
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
Thank you. I agree the letter I was not dropped before 1948. But if it was skipped for 48 and/or 49 then what parts did that omission apply to? Exactly what happened with that letter and the letter M? For me the situation remains unresolved at this stage as far as aluminium parts are concerned.
In his 37–64 SE (2014) Palmer said from 1948 and on the letter I was dropped from cast-aluminium DCs. However, via email in 2012 I had told him I had photos of I8 on 1948 BT trans lids, I 9 on 1949 BT trans cases, I8 on a Pan left case and I 9 on a Pan R-H case. Palmer replied, saying he had I8 on a 49F although he didn’t say what the part was. Crankcase? Trans case? He didn’t say.
Below is a photo of M9 on a 45ci left case but it doesn’t necessarily mean the letter I was skipped for DCs on these cases in 1949.
Do you have any info about the letters I and M for 1948–49 DCs on cast-aluminium parts, 45ci and/or BTs?
Eric
In his 37–64 SE (2014) Palmer said from 1948 and on the letter I was dropped from cast-aluminium DCs. However, via email in 2012 I had told him I had photos of I8 on 1948 BT trans lids, I 9 on 1949 BT trans cases, I8 on a Pan left case and I 9 on a Pan R-H case. Palmer replied, saying he had I8 on a 49F although he didn’t say what the part was. Crankcase? Trans case? He didn’t say.
Below is a photo of M9 on a 45ci left case but it doesn’t necessarily mean the letter I was skipped for DCs on these cases in 1949.
Do you have any info about the letters I and M for 1948–49 DCs on cast-aluminium parts, 45ci and/or BTs?
Eric
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 8:27 pm
- Bikes: WLA
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
No sorry Eric; my info comes from the same books you read and mention.
Haven't seen examples that contradict these claims.
Haven't seen examples that contradict these claims.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2405
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:28 am
- Bikes: 1950Panhead
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 366 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
Have you seen an M8 or M9 on any of these parts?I had told him I had photos of I8 on 1948 BT trans lids, I 9 on 1949 BT trans cases, I8 on a Pan left case and I 9 on a Pan R-H case.
Have you seen an I9 on a 45 left case?Below is a photo of M9 on a 45ci left case but it doesn’t necessarily mean the letter I was skipped for DCs on these cases in 1949.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:00 am
- Bikes: WLA Mk lll, civilianised
- Location: Gilgandra, New South Wales, Australia
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 117 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
Would it be a useful if we posted the casting date code and corresponding crankcase numbers and engine numbers so some documentation could be created for researchers?
OME
OME
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:29 am
- Bikes: H-D
- Location: Western Australia
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: Aging an engine by crankcase numbers.
Liberator, thanks for your reply. I have several examples of DCs that contradict Palmer and I posted some on CAI in the thread about errors in his 37-64 SE. In 2012 I even sent him photos of a certain BT trans case with features indicating it had not been cast in 1939 but in later-1949. It has date code I 9.
I also have several examples of I8 on BT trans lids cast not in 1938 but in 1948 as per the one below.
Eric
I also have several examples of I8 on BT trans lids cast not in 1938 but in 1948 as per the one below.
Eric