4 Speed trannie case differences??

Post Reply
George Greer
Senior Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:02 am
Bikes: 1942 WLA Type III
Hybrid WL/KH bobber project.
58 FL
Location: Markt Einersheim, Bayern
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 259 times
Contact:

4 Speed trannie case differences??

#1

Post by George Greer »

Hi all...

According to my 1958 to 1968 Electra-Glide/Duo-Glide parts manual, there were two different transmission cases.

One was part number 34700-36 Transmission Housing, 41 t0 64- FL, FLH

The other one was part number 34700-65, 65 to * - FL, FLH

What are the differences betweed the cases? And could one of the later cases be used on earlier frames?


Thanks,

George
hplhd
Senior Member
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 11:48 am
Bikes: 1998 heritage springer
1959 FLH
Location: indiana, usa
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#2

Post by hplhd »

george the most obvios dif is the 65 and later case had those ears to bolt the inner primary to. there mite be inside difrncs im not aware.
Sir_Rat
Inactive member
Member
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:10 am
Bikes: '37 UL, '79 Frankenstein, '88 Sporty
Location: Oahu Hawaii
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#3

Post by Sir_Rat »

George, the -65 was the first year electric start, which used a thick cast aluminum inner and outer primary cover. The -65 case had four ears on it to bolt up to the inner primary cover. The -36 had no such ears. You can run the -65 in your frame with out problems, but you would need a longer clutch pushrod and also you would need the early electric start outer primary with the rear floorboard tab on it as the electric start primary case sticks out to far to utilize the frame tab.

My opinion only , but I would only use the -65 if I was gonna go with electric start, besides that...a genuine -65 inner cover is getting to be kinda rare nowadays . Theres other reasons...im sure some one else will add them in.

Good Luck George...Mike
Tintin
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:24 pm
Bikes: 1972 D FLH
1956 Norton Dommieracer
1970 Norton Commando
1972 Dunstall Norton

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#4

Post by Tintin »

Sir_Rat wrote:My opinion only , but I would only use the -65 if I was gonna go with electric start, ...
The main difference is that there is an additional mainshaft support bearing in the -65 design which is bitterly needed IMHO.

And on pre-65 primaries this opens up the possibility to run one of those: Image


Tim
RUBONE
Moderator
Senior Member
Posts: 8407
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:09 am
Bikes: Multiple H-D, Ducati, BMW, Triumph, BSA,...
Has thanked: 482 times
Been thanked: 2957 times

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#5

Post by RUBONE »

A '65 case can easily be run with tin primaries, however there is no provision on the case for adjustment of the primary chain nor a lug for centering in the trans mounting plate so a custom adjuster must be used. When running the correct trans mainshaft to align with your '58 engine an outboard bearing will not fit, not enough room. for ease all around stick to a '64 and earlier set-up. But if you decide to run a '65 up, it is easy to do. I have used many over the years.
Robbie
George Greer
Senior Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:02 am
Bikes: 1942 WLA Type III
Hybrid WL/KH bobber project.
58 FL
Location: Markt Einersheim, Bayern
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 259 times
Contact:

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#6

Post by George Greer »

Robbie,

Thanks......I will keep looking for a early transmission,... or just a case IF I have to build one up.

Thanks to the time difference between Europe and US, I just missed out on a complete transmission.....ahhhhh

George
john HD
Moderator
Senior Member
Posts: 3713
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 11:38 pm
Bikes: '42 WLA X 2, '55FL, '93 Ultra Classic, '91 Fatboy, '97 883, '03 Rokon Trailbreaker, '83 GPz 750.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#7

Post by john HD »

george,

don't miss another one.

http://www.snipeswipe.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

i have been using it for years with good results.

john
Bosheff
Senior Member
Posts: 1270
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:23 pm
Bikes: 65 FLH 82 FLH
Location: Michigan
Been thanked: 60 times

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#8

Post by Bosheff »

65 motor and tranny with bearing support and tin primaries with inner cut out to clear bearing support in a 57 rigid, no problem....bosheff
George Greer
Senior Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:02 am
Bikes: 1942 WLA Type III
Hybrid WL/KH bobber project.
58 FL
Location: Markt Einersheim, Bayern
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 259 times
Contact:

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#9

Post by George Greer »

Ok,

Trying to upload correct size photos.

Need help in ID on this transmission.

George
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
RUBONE
Moderator
Senior Member
Posts: 8407
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:09 am
Bikes: Multiple H-D, Ducati, BMW, Triumph, BSA,...
Has thanked: 482 times
Been thanked: 2957 times

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#10

Post by RUBONE »

George,
That is a mid '50s trans. See the date code thread for the info on the 3-3 code used for approx 4 years for some unknown reason. The ratchet top is pre '59 also with no neutral light, kicker arm is '70s.
Robbie
George Greer
Senior Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:02 am
Bikes: 1942 WLA Type III
Hybrid WL/KH bobber project.
58 FL
Location: Markt Einersheim, Bayern
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 259 times
Contact:

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#11

Post by George Greer »

Robbie,

Thanks!!

So I should not have a problem using this unit with my 58 frame and engine?

George
Bosheff
Senior Member
Posts: 1270
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:23 pm
Bikes: 65 FLH 82 FLH
Location: Michigan
Been thanked: 60 times

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#12

Post by Bosheff »

It should bolt right in with no problems. Get rid of the kicker arm. You'll break yer ankel tryin to use that thing. Kicker arm first introduced in 1977 on the FXS I believe....bosheff
George Greer
Senior Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:02 am
Bikes: 1942 WLA Type III
Hybrid WL/KH bobber project.
58 FL
Location: Markt Einersheim, Bayern
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 259 times
Contact:

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#13

Post by George Greer »

Bosheff..

Thanks for the tip on the kicker arm, any suggestion as to which one to find?

Original one?

Next, the quest is on for inner and outer tin primary covers....and they don't have to be original........just cheap...

Then......rear fender, front end...dash panel..clutch basket..and the list goes on and on and on....

Thanks again to all for the answers!

George
CaptMike
Member
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:23 am
Bikes: 1998 Roadglide, 1957 FLH
Location: North Myrtle Beach
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#14

Post by CaptMike »

Bosheff wrote:It should bolt right in with no problems. Get rid of the kicker arm. You'll break yer ankel tryin to use that thing. Kicker arm first introduced in 1977 on the FXS I believe....bosheff

Ding, Ding, Ding... Winner!

I bought a new FXE (Superglide) in 1977 and you are Correct on the kick start... From memory it doesn't work so well. FYI the 1977 FXE (1200 Superglide) cost $3640.00 new out the door in Columbia S.C..
Bosheff
Senior Member
Posts: 1270
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:23 pm
Bikes: 65 FLH 82 FLH
Location: Michigan
Been thanked: 60 times

Re: 4 Speed trannie case differences??

#15

Post by Bosheff »

There are many kicker arms available from the aftermarket with the extra heavy duty ones probably being the most popular. One thing to watch for in aftermarket unit is the length of the arm. These were marketed for "stroker" motors, theory being a long arm would give ya more leverage to get the engine to roll over. Maybe or maybe not so good in theory, but ya gotta make sure the peddle doesn't hit the ground while tryin to start the beast. Not so practicle if yer runnin a short front end, or yer hog doesn't lean far enough to the primary side when yer kickin. Stock genuine H-D kicker arms come in I think, 3 versions not counting the one piece units found prior to 1954. The main difference is in the offset to clear yer exhaust system. I prefer a stock, genuine piece. They fit the starter shaft much better (tighter) than most aftermarket units, and they don't wear as quickly on the peddle end. Also, it's safer to run some sort of rubber peddle (popsickle peddle is my suggestion) than an exposed steel or brass piece as your foot won't slip off the peddle when it's wet. This saves ya from mashing yer ankle....bosheff
Post Reply

Return to “Transmission, Starter & Shifting”