The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

Post Reply
DuoDave
Member
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:33 pm
Bikes: duo
Been thanked: 1 time

The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#1

Post by DuoDave »

Have inches gotten smaller over the last forty years? I've been transferring my original rocker assemblies onto my new STD heads. I had a hell of a job screwing the mounting studs into the heads. They were a really tight fit. I bought a new 5/16s UNC tap and tried it in the old heads. It ran in no problem. Tried it in the STD heads, okay there too. Tried screwing in the studs again. Still way too tight. I ended up cutting down the threaded portion of the stud so they had less far to go in and eventually persuaded them into place. Now I am faced with the same situation with the top motor mount studs. It seems like the original studs and the threaded holes in the original heads are a tiny fraction larger diameter than the STD heads and the tap I bought. Am I missing something or has anybody else encountered this? ???
dirtydistrict
Member
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 12:00 pm
Bikes: 2010 road king at the moment. Won't last long
Location: CORNAS FRANCE

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#2

Post by dirtydistrict »

Duo, I had exactly the same trouble with the rockers stud: hard like hell even with teflon grease, i've been using a pile of nuts to screw them. I found that it was easier using studs from my old heads...rather than new ones. The top motor mount didn't showed any trouble and were easy to fit.
The studs were from Colony if I remember.
VintageTwin
Senior Member
Posts: 1333
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 5:11 pm
Bikes: '46 Knuck. '57 Panhead, '59 Panhead
Location: Repop Hell
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times
Contact:

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#3

Post by VintageTwin »

One thing i learned about the construction industry is: GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR, if you have a problem. Call STD and get this info straight from God. He has his own chair in the tech dept. Direct at..at.. gotta go find the number.
Cotten
Senior Member
Posts: 6937
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2002 2:30 am
Bikes: -
Location: Central Illinois
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 310 times

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#4

Post by Cotten »

If you check out SAE standards, there are different thread clearances for different applications.
Since rocker studs (and cylinder studs, etc.) are expected to NOT be removed, they have extra tight 'aircraft' tolerances.
This makes them a b-i-zitch to r & r, but it is proper and correct.

PS: My inch has shrunk quite a bit since I reached 40!
DuoDave
Member
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:33 pm
Bikes: duo
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#5

Post by DuoDave »

Thanks for the info, Cotten. You've restored my faith in STD's build quality. Knowing it doesn't make screwing the studs in any easier, though.
Talking of screwing and studs, I'm sorry to hear about your shrinking inch, but I have it on good authority that it's not how big it is, but what you do with it. ;D
Cotten
Senior Member
Posts: 6937
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2002 2:30 am
Bikes: -
Location: Central Illinois
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 310 times

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#6

Post by Cotten »

Yeah, they all used to tell me that, even before it shrunk.

(Thank gawd I'm married now, and don't miss it.)

Back to mechanical 'studs',.. It is a real good question to ask just how these gn*t's-*ss-tight fasteners are actually supposed to be assembled.
I don't have a decent answer, as they often give me fits.
Anyone on this forum know how the automotive or aircraft industry does it?
Anyone have a forum where they can ask?
Thanks in advance!!!
PanPal
Senior Member
Posts: 1504
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 11:02 pm
Bikes: 50 EL chopper
44 U that looks like a 37.
60 FLH (Sold)
59 FLH (Sold)
58 FL (Sold)
08 CVO Road King
Location: Maryland
Has thanked: 242 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#7

Post by PanPal »

Have you tried heating up the bare head before screwing the stud in? Could also freeze the stud.
They make .005" over 5/16 taps, but how loose will the stud get when the head heats up? Could be this is why the fit is so tight.
Machinist handbook???

The machinery handbook states that thread standards were changed in 1949 and again in 1959. What year is your pan???
This still does not explain new heads and new bolts not fitting well.
I did read that they would get the male part to a sub zero temp before installing parts.
And this is how you fit a square peg into a round hole
panoply
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:32 pm

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#8

Post by panoply »

DuoDave,

Did you ever get your studs transferred? If so what worked for you?
DuoDave
Member
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:33 pm
Bikes: duo
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#9

Post by DuoDave »

Like I said, I cut down the threaded portion that screws down into the head and eventually got them screwed down far enough so that they would not foul the pan covers. I was seriously concerned that if I had tried to screw them in the full length that I would damage the threads in the heads or even crack the alloy around the screw holes. I am back at sea now so I have not installed the top motor mount studs yet. I think I will try gently heating the alloy around the hole first. The expansion should help things along.
57stroker
Inactive member
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 8:04 pm
Bikes: '57
Location: Burley Idaho

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#10

Post by 57stroker »

Heat transfers quickly! You may consider coating things with anti-sieze. When things stop moving when they are warm, they are usually there for life! Find some good nuts and lock them together and use an inpact gun. If you know a machinist, they could make you a blind nut to use w/ the air gun. Good luck!
kell
Member
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 10:05 pm

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#11

Post by kell »

I assume a blind nut means the hole doesn't go all the way through. Maybe you could just weld something onto one end of a nut to accomplish the same thing easier than using a drill and a bottoming tap. If you can do it without warping the nut an awful lot.
A "long nut" might be your best bet. Like a regular nut but a lot longer! Maybe even an inch!
57Kicker
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2003 3:26 pm
Bikes: -

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#12

Post by 57Kicker »

Is there a possibility that the threads are galling? If so anti-seize would work as 57Stroker suggests.
Maybe this is too little-too late...just a thought
DuoDave
Member
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:33 pm
Bikes: duo
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#13

Post by DuoDave »

Sometimes I can be pretty dense. The solution to a problem can be so obvious that I can't see it. :
I already know that a UNC tap fits perfectly in the threaded holes in the STD heads, so if I run a UNC die up the threads of the top motor mount studs they should screw in no problem. How simple is that?
Cotten
Senior Member
Posts: 6937
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2002 2:30 am
Bikes: -
Location: Central Illinois
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 310 times

Re: The shrinking inch (rocker assemblies onto new STD heads)

#14

Post by Cotten »

I suggest a sturdy grade of Loctite, and use your rocker blocks to align them while it sets up.
Post Reply

Return to “Cylinderheads”