gearing
-
- Inactive member
- Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:22 am
- Location: phoenix
gearing
hello everyone. my panhead when in 4th gear feels wrapped out around 55. i am running a motor sprocket at 23, tranny at 25, and rear sprocket at 51. any suggestions on which numbers to run so i can take to the highways more easily? thanks, billy
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6937
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2002 2:30 am
- Bikes: -
- Location: Central Illinois
- Has thanked: 112 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: gearing
You are already geared "tall" for the highway with that 25T countersprocket.panhead55 wrote:hello everyone. my panhead when in 4th gear feels wrapped out around 55. i am running a motor sprocket at 23, tranny at 25, and rear sprocket at 51. any suggestions on which numbers to run so i can take to the highways more easily? thanks, billy
If anything you are 'lugging it', and not even into its powerband at 55 mph; A 74" motor geared that high shouldn't peak its powerband until twice that speed!
The motor can reach a point where the pulses blend into an 'aircraft whine', and still have throttle left for passing. The motors are designed to turn faster than the average rider's intuition.
If indeed highway speeds are uncomfortable, then I would suggest searching for causes of vibration, such as worn chains and sprockets, and other chassis issues. If it is just a matter of motor noise, it might need fixing.
....Cotten
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:53 am
- Bikes: 1951 Fl
- Location: Wasilla, Alaska
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: gearing
What RPM do you recommend at a cruising speed of 65mph Cotten?Cotten wrote:
You are already geared "tall" for the highway with that 25T countersprocket.
If anything you are 'lugging it', and not even into its powerband at 55 mph; A 74" motor geared that high shouldn't peak its powerband until twice that speed!
What RPM range is the powerband?
The motor can reach a point where the pulses blend into an 'aircraft whine', and still have throttle left for passing. The motors are designed to turn faster than the average rider's intuition.
At what RPM does this 'aircraft whine' happen?
If indeed highway speeds are uncomfortable, then I would suggest searching for causes of vibration, such as worn chains and sprockets, and other chassis issues. If it is just a matter of motor noise, it might need fixing.
....Cotten
Dale
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 5:11 pm
- Bikes: '46 Knuck. '57 Panhead, '59 Panhead
- Location: Repop Hell
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 9 times
- Contact:
Re: gearing
For low rev's in 4th gear at 62 mph, use a 24-T motor sprocket, a stock clutch hub sprocket and a 25-T trans sprocket with the 51 tooth rear (stock) rear wheel sprocket.
If you want it taller and less rev's than that, use a 26-T trans sprocket instead of a 25-T. It's said that using the 26-T trans sprocket will create a long transition period between 3rd and 4th gear.
Note: A 26-T tranny sprocket can only be used with a tin primary. A 26-T will hit the inner aluminum primary on a '65 and later Big Twin.
If you want it taller and less rev's than that, use a 26-T trans sprocket instead of a 25-T. It's said that using the 26-T trans sprocket will create a long transition period between 3rd and 4th gear.
Note: A 26-T tranny sprocket can only be used with a tin primary. A 26-T will hit the inner aluminum primary on a '65 and later Big Twin.
-
- Inactive member
- Member
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 2:05 pm
- Location: Roxboro, NC, U.S.A.
- Been thanked: 4 times
- Contact:
Re: gearing
Billy -panhead55 wrote:hello everyone. my panhead when in 4th gear feels wrapped out around 55. i am running a motor sprocket at 23, tranny at 25, and rear sprocket at 51. any suggestions on which numbers to run so i can take to the highways more easily? thanks, billy
My '59 has had the following, since I bought it in '74: 23T-engine, 22T-tranny, 51T-wheel. My engine/transmission have been tired for as long as I have owned it. But, I took it anywhere in the state (N.Carolina) that I wanted. Never ran it over 45 or 50 mph, except for an occasional hop onto an Interstate to get to the nearest off-ramp. It gave up last August ('08). So, it's under rebuild at the moment. I will leave the 23T-engine compensating sprocket on it, but have installed a 24T-tranny sprocket on the fresh bebuild. After break-in, I will have no qualms about any speed that I want to run. Oil consumption will be higher at Interstate speeds. But, I still don't plan to travel them. Just treat them as a necessary evil to get me to the next 2-lane, if it happens to be in the way of my route.
My reason for staying with this gearing: I can't sight-see at fast speeds; I ride backroads with the least amount of traffic; This gearing is perfect for 55 to 60 mph, with occasional stints at 65 to 70.
Jack
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6937
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2002 2:30 am
- Bikes: -
- Location: Central Illinois
- Has thanked: 112 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: gearing
Dale asked:
What RPM do you recommend at a cruising speed of 65mph Cotten?
I have never run a tachometer, so I really do not know .
But my stock 74" had no problem keeping up with a pack running 75 on out-of-state runs with a loaded sidecar rig with 22T on the motor, and 22T on the countersprocket. As I mentioned previously, it still had throttle left.
H-D Big Twins have big flywheels. That huge rotating mass stores energy. The faster they spin, the more energy is safely stored for the next next revolution. The limit is the reciprocating mass that must accellerate and stop and change directions.
Connecting rods are not a weak link, and neither are pistons, if everything else is in order. Similar designs survive in motors that turn twice as fast.
The long valve train with poor angles limits top RPM to much less than other designs, but the powerband still reaches far beyond what the average rider feels is comfortable.
The problem is that motors don't want to be lugged any more than they like being red-lined.
The irony of the last few decades of custom builders is that they gravitated to light flywheels that reach rpm quicker, but lost mass to dampen the forces that want to tear a motor apart. Add the taste for overkill oilpumps that flood everything at high Rs, and big throated carbs with peaky cams that don't even turn on until WFO,...
Many motors were built for high-end performance when riders actually want low-end performance, and detune them with tall sprockets so they virtually idle down the road!
And sadly, many of those motors were balanced with a high factor, and it may well be the balancing that contributes to riders feeling "wrapped out", because they aren't going fast enough!
.....Cotten
What RPM do you recommend at a cruising speed of 65mph Cotten?
I have never run a tachometer, so I really do not know .
But my stock 74" had no problem keeping up with a pack running 75 on out-of-state runs with a loaded sidecar rig with 22T on the motor, and 22T on the countersprocket. As I mentioned previously, it still had throttle left.
H-D Big Twins have big flywheels. That huge rotating mass stores energy. The faster they spin, the more energy is safely stored for the next next revolution. The limit is the reciprocating mass that must accellerate and stop and change directions.
Connecting rods are not a weak link, and neither are pistons, if everything else is in order. Similar designs survive in motors that turn twice as fast.
The long valve train with poor angles limits top RPM to much less than other designs, but the powerband still reaches far beyond what the average rider feels is comfortable.
The problem is that motors don't want to be lugged any more than they like being red-lined.
The irony of the last few decades of custom builders is that they gravitated to light flywheels that reach rpm quicker, but lost mass to dampen the forces that want to tear a motor apart. Add the taste for overkill oilpumps that flood everything at high Rs, and big throated carbs with peaky cams that don't even turn on until WFO,...
Many motors were built for high-end performance when riders actually want low-end performance, and detune them with tall sprockets so they virtually idle down the road!
And sadly, many of those motors were balanced with a high factor, and it may well be the balancing that contributes to riders feeling "wrapped out", because they aren't going fast enough!
.....Cotten
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:53 am
- Bikes: 1951 Fl
- Location: Wasilla, Alaska
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: gearing
Thanks for the response Cotten.
According to Jack Hester's calculator,
Sprockets 22-37-22-51, Your engine speed at 75 mph was 3750 rpm.
11mm Belt and sprockets, 31-47-24-51 My engine speed at 75 mph is 3100.
That being said, I cruise at 60 - 65 mph at an rpm range of 2400-2700.
after that, vibrations start to fatigue things like the elements in the bulbs, chain guard tabs, primary tin tabs, and license plate....Which is the reason for my current tear down. Hopefully I can find the problem without having to split the engine to check for true on the crank assy.
Dale
According to Jack Hester's calculator,
Sprockets 22-37-22-51, Your engine speed at 75 mph was 3750 rpm.
11mm Belt and sprockets, 31-47-24-51 My engine speed at 75 mph is 3100.
That being said, I cruise at 60 - 65 mph at an rpm range of 2400-2700.
after that, vibrations start to fatigue things like the elements in the bulbs, chain guard tabs, primary tin tabs, and license plate....Which is the reason for my current tear down. Hopefully I can find the problem without having to split the engine to check for true on the crank assy.
Dale
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6937
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2002 2:30 am
- Bikes: -
- Location: Central Illinois
- Has thanked: 112 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: gearing
Dale figured: "Sprockets 22-37-22-51, Your engine speed at 75 mph was 3750 rpm."
Geez.
Even I thought the motor was turning faster.
....Cotten
Geez.
Even I thought the motor was turning faster.
....Cotten
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:04 am
- Bikes: 37ULH,46UL,47EL(80"),65FL,61KH-WL-BSA hybrid,56square4,several 50's BSA 500 singles
- Location: Interlaken, NY
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 317 times
Re: gearing
Here's a rule of thumb for engine speeds: with a final ratio of 3.7:1, engine speed is 3000 rpm at 60 mph. works for most rear tires, pretty much. Even in cars. Just do the math to figure your final ratio, and then do that proportional thing you slept through in 8th grade math to figure for your final ratio.
DD
DD
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 12:26 pm
- Bikes: *
- Location: Sultan, WASH
- Been thanked: 6 times
- Contact:
Re: gearing
my bike has a 8mm belt drive and 25T tranny 51 rear
well I finally put this on and was able to get a accurate pace.
so at 60mph I turn over 2600rpm and at 70mph it turns over at 3050
yea I am a bit slow at get it put on .....LOL
well I finally put this on and was able to get a accurate pace.
so at 60mph I turn over 2600rpm and at 70mph it turns over at 3050
yea I am a bit slow at get it put on .....LOL
-
- Former member
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3332
- Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 1:54 pm
- Bikes: 1958flh 1969sporty,had a knuckle but sold back to original owner
- Location: NEW JERSEY
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 277 times
Re: gearing
(Now thats the truth on todays builds concerning motors!-Well said COTTON!.---richieCotten wrote:Dale asked:
What RPM do you recommend at a cruising speed of 65mph Cotten?
I have never run a tachometer, so I really do not know .
But my stock 74" had no problem keeping up with a pack running 75 on out-of-state runs with a loaded sidecar rig with 22T on the motor, and 22T on the countersprocket. As I mentioned previously, it still had throttle left.
H-D Big Twins have big flywheels. That huge rotating mass stores energy. The faster they spin, the more energy is safely stored for the next next revolution. The limit is the reciprocating mass that must accellerate and stop and change directions.
Connecting rods are not a weak link, and neither are pistons, if everything else is in order. Similar designs survive in motors that turn twice as fast.
The long valve train with poor angles limits top RPM to much less than other designs, but the powerband still reaches far beyond what the average rider feels is comfortable.
The problem is that motors don't want to be lugged any more than they like being red-lined.
The irony of the last few decades of custom builders is that they gravitated to light flywheels that reach rpm quicker, but lost mass to dampen the forces that want to tear a motor apart. Add the taste for overkill oilpumps that flood everything at high Rs, and big throated carbs with peaky cams that don't even turn on until WFO,...
Many motors were built for high-end performance when riders actually want low-end performance, and detune them with tall sprockets so they virtually idle down the road!
And sadly, many of those motors were balanced with a high factor, and it may well be the balancing that contributes to riders feeling "wrapped out", because they aren't going fast enough!
.....Cotten